Imagine the essential transformations necessary to live well in the years ahead — the progress we must make toward healthy, local and diverse sources of food, water and energy, meaningful jobs, lively cities, and functioning ecosystems.

The goal is enormous, but the steps are clear.

We must start by asking: Is there a way to encourage an ethical, social movement in these directions and make money at the same time? Might there be a more natural model of development that generates competitive financial returns to workers and investors while actually improving social and environmental conditions? How do we find financial reward building a more reliable prosperity?

The Natural Capital Fund’s investment in Ecotrust Forests, an ecosystem investment fund, has created long-term wealth through healthy watersheds, habitat for nature-based tourism, carbon storage and stable forestry jobs in rural communities. Photo by Sam Beebe

Ecotrust believes this is possible because for over twenty years we have been carefully growing tangible initiatives that generate competitive returns while improving the wellbeing of both people and place.

Instead of investing in traditional Wall Street financial products like derivatives, large-cap public equities and corporate bonds, we have used our Natural Capital Fund – our working endowment and signature investment vehicle — to back things that deliver better returns. Our long-term forest ecosystem investments protect pristine habitat for nature-based tourism, build healthy watersheds for clean water, reduce carbon emissions and create more stable jobs in rural communities. We have used our capital and expertise to help build the nation’s first environmental bank, to lend to fishermen growing local, community-based fisheries, and to pioneer green building infrastructure that improves the livability of our cities.

After two decades of investing across the region, our Natural Capital Fund has converted $30 million in grants and program- and mission-related investments into $800 million in assets at work in communities from California to Alaska.

And our experience has more relevance than ever, as private capital is increasingly seeking to serve greater good. A broad group of investors is now actively looking for social and environmental, as well as financial, returns; In the United States alone, this market is valued at over $4 billion.

Investors are looking for social and environmental, as well as financial, returns — an approach we have taken in building a loan fund for community-based fishermen in the North Pacific. Photo by Melissa Berns/Old Harbor Native Corporation.

So our question now becomes: How can we better leverage this powerful global movement involving millions of investors and hundreds of funds and financial institutions to scale our collective efforts and move the global economy toward a more reliable prosperity?

We are not necessarily inventing a new idea here, but rather building on a strategy inherent in nature: invest in diversity and redundancy to withstand unforeseen shocks. Patagonia founder, Ecotrust friend and Natural Capital Fund investor Yvon Chouinard puts it simply, “The safest thing to do is invest in what we need, not what we want.”

Today people call this “impact investing.”

Tomorrow, we imagine people will simply call it “investing” — the standard and accepted way to design a more reliable prosperity.

It is the best way to catalyze the change we seek in the world.

It’s an idea whose time has come.

 


 

What if anybody could find investment opportunities in local and social enterprises, with the click of a mouse?

ChangeXchange NW, a new website launched Nov. 8 by Portland-based Springboard Innovation,with support from New York’s Mission Markets, will facilitate just that, allowing a range of investors to research offerings in the Northwest and buy a stake in companies — regardless of whether the investors are retirees with $100 or veteran venture capitalists with millions.

“We are creating opportunities to get capital into the hands of local and social entrepreneurs,” says Amy Pearl, Springboard’s executive director. “There’s potential to tap money large and small to grow the economy in each of our Northwest communities.”

Springboard Innovation’s Amy Pearl

ChangeXchange NW aims to be a more sophisticated cousin of crowdfunding sites like Kickstarter. Evolving from a donation-oriented site launched in 2009, the new platform will offer space to crowdfund business startups, while also featuring more advanced investment vehicles in direct public offerings, equity investments, and secondary trading of shares in new and existing businesses.

Mike Van Patten, CEO of Mission Markets

A demo site launched last week offered a glimpse of how investors will use the site. The homepage lists investment opportunities and an interactive map of the same – think of a less hectic version of popular real estate sites Estately or Zillow. Clicking on individual investments leads to details on the offerings, backgrounds on the companies and pro forma financial documents.

Pearl and Mission Markets CEO Mike Van Patten say that they imagine potential investors meeting business owners and doing extensive due diligence offline, much as private equity investors do now.

But once an investment is made, investors can use ChangeXchange NW to track financial performance, as well as environmental and social performance measured against multiple impact rating tools such as GIIRS. Investors and business owners will also be able to communicate through a closed social network on the site.

“It really bringing efficiency to investing,” says Van Patten.

The question is will investors use the platform? Mike Van Patten believes it will take a few successful investment paybacks through the platform, before Changexchange NW catches on. More established companies looking to expand – say a pizza shop adding locations – will make for good pioneers on the exchange. “When investors are comfortable that they will get their investments back, then it will tip,” he says.

Pearl and Springboard plan an extensive on-the-ground education effort throughout the Northwest over the next 18 months to support the exchange. She’ll get businesses, media, government officials and the public up to speed on how private equity works and how they can put their dollars to work through the exchange. She’s already developing partnerships with ten cities and counties around the region. And Springboard is working on a companion business incubator, Hatch, in Portland.

Both Pearl and Van Patten say a confluence of factors make the timing good for ChangeXchange: demand for local products and services is rising; more impact investors are seeking environmental and social, as well as financial, returns; social entrepreneurship is on the rise; and new federal regulations outlined in the 2012 JOBS Act loosen rules on how private companies can raise money, including through internet solicitations.

Overall, Van Patten sees the marketplace in the early stages of a 20-year shift toward more responsible companies; New equity capital will accelerate that shift:”Private equity capital can change things dramatically, in ways that donations and grant funding for social enterprise cannot.”

November 12 to 18 is Global Entrepreneurship Week, and Ecotrust and Portland, OR are getting a running start on the festivities, with a focus on social entrepreneurship. We’ll be hosting events at Ecotrust, talking about others around town and curating some extra discussion around social enterprise. How are you @unleashingideas during #GEW? See you on Twitter.

 

By Terry Brandt

A lot is being written about how to best lay the foundation for our country’s economic recovery. There seems to be little consensus  on whether we should borrow capital, which increases our national debt on the promise of stimulating the economy through increased spending, or if we should shrink the size of government to reduce the national debt and reduce taxes to preserve our next generation’s future.

Somewhat lost in the national dialogue is how communities must independently find ways to resolve problems of high unemployment that hinder local recovery.

That’s because neither the federal government nor traditional banks are underwriting local recovery as they should. In 2008, the federal government committed to spend $475 billion (TARP funds) to primarily stabilize the balance sheets of troubled banks that had been hit with widespread loan foreclosures. Fast forward to 2012: nearly four years later, in response to unprecedented customer deposits and large amounts of cash, these rescued and profitable banks have established large advertising campaigns directed at lending to small businesses.

Due to the low cost of funds, banks can now provide low interest rates and they say they are aggressively making small business loans. However, pressures from FDIC examiners, high credit score requirements, and demands for increased collateral have squeezed the number of qualified businesses into a very small pool.

Vital small businesses needing relatively small amounts of capital are lured by promises of a loan only to be worn out and turned away. What can be done to help these small local businesses that may represent one of the best paths to our economic recovery?

With enough capital, small businesses can spur job growth, says Albina Opportunities Corporation’s Terry Brandt. Photo courtesy of AOC.

Here’s how we might tackle things in Oregon.

The results of a newly completed study, Oregon Capital Scan,  commissioned by the State Treasurer’s Office, Business Oregon, the Oregon Community Foundation, and Meyer Memorial Trust were released this summer. Its primary goal was to identify gaps in Oregon’s capital ecosystems. It also offered recommendations of how investments could be made using an “Oregon Portfolio” investment conduit using intermediaries to target specific gaps in capital around the state.

In my opinion, significant to the success of this strategy is to find ways to operate between more stringent bank lending practices and the large public give-away stimulus packages. Currently non-bank microlenders have done a good job of trying to fill this demand for very small business entrepreneurs. However, there are large gaps in capital above what microlending can provide.

As stated in the OCS report, there is a need for an intermediary non-bank lending platform that is designed to be both innovative and agile. I believe that it must also possess a deep connection with the local community to understand how to best leverage scarce public and private resources in the most efficient ways possible. There must be accountability in the process, and its outcomes, including job production, must be measurable indicators of success. 

Our limited resources must be invested with just the right dose of risk tailored to satisfy both the financial and mentoring needs of existing small businesses. The intermediary lender must be personable, proactive, and an advocate for the success of small business borrowers.

It must think like small businesses and take time to understand the needs of its clients to provide tailor-made business advisory services to assist them to be successful. It must be transparent – no hidden fees, it must be upfront about its process, and it must be honest with what can and cannot be done. Perhaps most importantly, it must have a belief that strong local communities shaped by successful small businesses will be the rising tide that lifts all boats.

At this time, there is a large pipeline of qualified loan requests in Oregon and around the country that cannot be funded due to a lack of lending capital. These businesses represent the growing marginalized ring just outside the small lending pool referenced earlier. Yes, they have suffered reduced credit scores and yes, their assets have been eroded as the result of the recent financial collapse not seen in recent memory. And they may be higher-risk bets than those in the small-risk pool. However, like large banks that received TARP funds, they also need help to repair their balance sheets. Even without government subsidy, through their perseverance and hard work, they have survived and their cash flows have returned. But in order for them to again grow and hire more people, they must have access to capital.

At Albina Oportunities Corporation, we have assumed a role in finding innovative ways to cost-effectively and efficiently work to kick-start our local recovery, beyond traditional bank lending. We have seen that one job is retained or created for every $4,130 of loan funds we disburse, and we’ve seen no loan losses while substantially increasing living-wage jobs in the community. More importantly, we’ve established a lending platform that addresses the capital needs of local small businesses not fulfilled through traditional lending resources. In fact, every AOC loan has gone to a small business that has been rejected by a bank.

Our work has only begun to address the demand for our loans and need for our advisory services. It will take further capital investments in our lending model to continue this necessary work. Without this additional support, our initiative and others like it will only scratch the surface of providing access to capital by qualified local small businesses.

Terry Brandt is executive director of Albina Opportunities Corporation.

November 12 to 18 is Global Entrepreneurship Week, and Ecotrust and Portland, OR are getting a running start on the festivities, with a focus on social entrepreneurship. We’ll be hosting events at Ecotrust, talking about others around town and curating some extra discussion around social enterprise. How are you @unleashingideas during #GEW? See you on Twitter.

 

 

Spreading those killer social innovations can be tough. There’s rarely enough money to support the ventures, the marketplace needs to take a leap of faith and if the government is involved, well, things are slow.  We’ve had our share of all of these frustrations and more here at Ecotrust. But early on we saw that raising investment capital with a venture tint to it — high-risk, high-return — was crucial to making innovation fly.

We raised money for our Natural Capital Center building and for ventures in ecotourism, emerging technology and progressive media through our Natural Capital Fund. That fund also matched investment from ShoreBank of Chicago in the social and environmental banking venture, ShoreBank Pacific — now part of One PacificCoast Bank. And we attracted three dozen private investors to back Ecotrust Forests, a fund which derives financial returns as well as environmental and social benefits from 12,000 acres of forestland in the Pacific Northwest.

All of this was early impact investing.

This week we’re watching with intrigue as our friends at the Hood River, Ore.-based Farmer’s Conservation Alliance are beginning an innovative capital raising move that — although it doesn’t offer the financial returns of true impact investing — promises to push social innovation financing forward.

FCA builds innovative screening devices to keep endangered fish out of irrigation canals and they’ve announced a $1.5 million growth capital campaign that promises tangible benefits for each “unit” purchased in the campaign — something like buying a share. Each of thirty $25,000 shares bought will open up 36 river miles to safe fish passage, deliver 1.5 Megawatts of green, fish-friendly hydro power driven by irrigation water and will enable $66,125 in savings annually by landowners, mainly in avoided maintenance costs on irrigation canals. The group is also offering eight hundred $1,000 shares.

One of the Farmers Conservation Alliance screens at work. Fish and debris take the right chute and water spills down through the screen and flows out to the left. Courtesy of FCA.

The details are in a prospectus, drawn up with the help of the Nonprofit Finance Fund, the national community development bank and consultants.

FCA’s technology has potentially broad application. There are 300,000 water diversions across the country and an estimated 75% are unscreened, endangering fish that could be pulled out of rivers and into irrigation canals, and also leaving canals open to leaves, sticks and other clogging debris. FCA has installed just 25 screens from Oregon to Wyoming and already they estimate they’ve saved landowners close to $500,000 in maintenance costs.

But installing FCA’s patented technology  — which shoots fish and debris over the top of a screen that allows water to fall vertically into irrigation canals — is a long process of government permits and design approvals from public agencies. That’ll be shortened by a recent approval of the FCA device by the National Marine Fisheries Service. But the Hood River group needs bridge capital to push its innovation forward, and that’s where the new investment will help.

Leaves running over a Farmers Screen.

“We’re sort of like a pharmaceutical drug going through the approval process,” says FCA director Julie Davies O’Shea. “We need this capital because our project timelines are long.”

The group grew out of technology developed by farmers in the Hood River Farmer’s Irrigation District. The inventors licensed the screen design with the stipulation that FCA market it widely and reinvest profits in similar social ventures that will help rural areas.

Still in the early stages of revenue generation, Davies O’Shea says the current capital push will eventually allow the group to tip its venture to profitability, and then begin to spread the wealth to other rural ventures.  That’s what we call impact.

 

Ecotrust Forest Management (EFM) recently gained certification as a B Corp, a fast-growing corporate designation that requires participating companies meet a triple bottom line: high environmental and community standards, in addition to delivering financial returns to shareholders. The certification comes through B Lab, a leading advocate for corporate reform. More than 500 companies are certified nationwide, and California recently added its name to a list of seven states that have passed legislation making benefit corporations a new, legal corporate class. Continue reading »

Connect with us: