It is a sunny afternoon in northeast Portland, and I am walking through a 25-acre open field, scattering seeds. The Cascade Mountains and the Columbia Gorge rise up behind me; the sun streams through billowing clouds as chains of wild geese fly in a V formation across the sky. All around me, nearly a hundred other Portlanders walk, scattering the seeds of a mix of Willamette Valley wildflowers from the Bosky Dell native plant nursery.

Verde organizer Tony DeFalco at the future Cully Park.

Most are residents of the surrounding Cully neighborhood, gathered to commemorate the restoration of this field and its future use as a neighborhood park. Our seed-scattering is just one piece of an afternoon-long Cully Park Land Blessing Ceremony – including prayers, songs, dances, and speeches by members of the community.

As it stands, there’s not much to see here at the future Cully Park, soon to emerge on this former construction waste landfill and sand-and-gravel pit mine. But the Land Blessing Ceremony represents a watershed moment in a long, participatory process of ecological restoration and greenspace development. It’s a sign that a relatively invisible community in one of America’s model cities is finally coming into its own.

Restoration has become a household word here in Portland, which New York Times columnist and Oregon native son Nicholas Kristof has called America’s environmental laboratory. But it’s relatively new to the Cully neighborhood, one of the poorest and most diverse in Oregon. Until recently, living conditions in Cully have been closer to the seldom-mentioned underbelly coined the “Other Portland” – poor, underserved and disconnected to the strong central city and revitalized core neighborhoods, and the green economy that has grown up around both.

According to the Regional Equity Atlas of the Coalition for a Livable Future, Cully suffers from poverty, lack of open space, and lack of food access. Cully is also more racially and ethnically diverse than Portland as a whole: 44.7% of Cully residents are people of color, compared to the regional average of 20.2%. The neighborhood has undergone rapid demographic change in the last several years, with a large influx of Latino immigrants. Access to public and private-sector services has not kept pace with the rest of the city.

But thanks to a strong neighborhood association and a cluster of robust community development organizations, the Cully community is now reversing its fortune through its own initiative, bolstered by innovative partnerships with city agencies, private sector firms and nonprofits.

“The energy is powerful,” relates community organizer Tony DeFalco of local social venture organization Verde. “People are fired up. Finally, something’s happening here.”

First guests: Geese have already taken to the Cully Park site.

Through collaborative efforts to develop the park, improve the local housing stock, and rezone the commercial corridor for walkability and access to services, the neighborhood’s residents are creating opportunities for themselves, and expanding the definition of a green city by making sure social equity, fairness and community participation are part of the mix.

The Living Cully Ecodistrict brings together a group of community partners including Verde, NAYA, the Native American Youth and Family Center, whose Portland headquarters are located right here in the Cully neighborhood, and Hacienda, a local community development corporation (CDC) that provides affordable housing, small business services, and family support. Housing redevelopment, ecological restoration, green street improvements, and more open space acquisition are equally important items on the neighborhood agenda. With schoolchildren, homeless residents, and other community groups actively planning, restoring and building new spaces in the neighborhood, landscape architect Randolph Hester would call this process ecological democracy — participatory urban design that nourishes both people and place.

A veteran of the environmental movement who’s worked in marine conservation and land trust sectors, DeFalco has teamed with his colleagues at Verde, who run landscaping, energy retrofitting and nursery operations — all in the name of bringing economic opportunity and environmental justice to the neighborhood. Yet, to build upon this sense of community will require anticipating and responding to challenges. As Cully grows more attractive, gentrification will loom large on the horizon, as recent patterns of displacement in Portland attest.

Anticipating the threat, DeFalco and his colleagues have built local contracting, hiring and business development into the bedrock of their strategy; as the amenities multiply, so will jobs and incomes. “We need to own the park,” he asserts. “If there’s restoration, we want to put local people to work doing that. If there’s a new community center, we want to build it.”

Verde and partners are now setting their sights on a recent golf course purchase by the Trust for Public Land at the edge of the neighborhood. If some of the 100-plus acres become public space, Cully could suddenly become a park-rich community. And local residents could find opportunities for employment and small business development through restoration and other green building contracts as part of the site transformation. It’s all part of evolving shape of green in places like the Other Portland. “This is where the action is now,” says DeFalco.

 

By Terry Brandt

A lot is being written about how to best lay the foundation for our country’s economic recovery. There seems to be little consensus  on whether we should borrow capital, which increases our national debt on the promise of stimulating the economy through increased spending, or if we should shrink the size of government to reduce the national debt and reduce taxes to preserve our next generation’s future.

Somewhat lost in the national dialogue is how communities must independently find ways to resolve problems of high unemployment that hinder local recovery.

That’s because neither the federal government nor traditional banks are underwriting local recovery as they should. In 2008, the federal government committed to spend $475 billion (TARP funds) to primarily stabilize the balance sheets of troubled banks that had been hit with widespread loan foreclosures. Fast forward to 2012: nearly four years later, in response to unprecedented customer deposits and large amounts of cash, these rescued and profitable banks have established large advertising campaigns directed at lending to small businesses.

Due to the low cost of funds, banks can now provide low interest rates and they say they are aggressively making small business loans. However, pressures from FDIC examiners, high credit score requirements, and demands for increased collateral have squeezed the number of qualified businesses into a very small pool.

Vital small businesses needing relatively small amounts of capital are lured by promises of a loan only to be worn out and turned away. What can be done to help these small local businesses that may represent one of the best paths to our economic recovery?

With enough capital, small businesses can spur job growth, says Albina Opportunities Corporation’s Terry Brandt. Photo courtesy of AOC.

Here’s how we might tackle things in Oregon.

The results of a newly completed study, Oregon Capital Scan,  commissioned by the State Treasurer’s Office, Business Oregon, the Oregon Community Foundation, and Meyer Memorial Trust were released this summer. Its primary goal was to identify gaps in Oregon’s capital ecosystems. It also offered recommendations of how investments could be made using an “Oregon Portfolio” investment conduit using intermediaries to target specific gaps in capital around the state.

In my opinion, significant to the success of this strategy is to find ways to operate between more stringent bank lending practices and the large public give-away stimulus packages. Currently non-bank microlenders have done a good job of trying to fill this demand for very small business entrepreneurs. However, there are large gaps in capital above what microlending can provide.

As stated in the OCS report, there is a need for an intermediary non-bank lending platform that is designed to be both innovative and agile. I believe that it must also possess a deep connection with the local community to understand how to best leverage scarce public and private resources in the most efficient ways possible. There must be accountability in the process, and its outcomes, including job production, must be measurable indicators of success. 

Our limited resources must be invested with just the right dose of risk tailored to satisfy both the financial and mentoring needs of existing small businesses. The intermediary lender must be personable, proactive, and an advocate for the success of small business borrowers.

It must think like small businesses and take time to understand the needs of its clients to provide tailor-made business advisory services to assist them to be successful. It must be transparent – no hidden fees, it must be upfront about its process, and it must be honest with what can and cannot be done. Perhaps most importantly, it must have a belief that strong local communities shaped by successful small businesses will be the rising tide that lifts all boats.

At this time, there is a large pipeline of qualified loan requests in Oregon and around the country that cannot be funded due to a lack of lending capital. These businesses represent the growing marginalized ring just outside the small lending pool referenced earlier. Yes, they have suffered reduced credit scores and yes, their assets have been eroded as the result of the recent financial collapse not seen in recent memory. And they may be higher-risk bets than those in the small-risk pool. However, like large banks that received TARP funds, they also need help to repair their balance sheets. Even without government subsidy, through their perseverance and hard work, they have survived and their cash flows have returned. But in order for them to again grow and hire more people, they must have access to capital.

At Albina Oportunities Corporation, we have assumed a role in finding innovative ways to cost-effectively and efficiently work to kick-start our local recovery, beyond traditional bank lending. We have seen that one job is retained or created for every $4,130 of loan funds we disburse, and we’ve seen no loan losses while substantially increasing living-wage jobs in the community. More importantly, we’ve established a lending platform that addresses the capital needs of local small businesses not fulfilled through traditional lending resources. In fact, every AOC loan has gone to a small business that has been rejected by a bank.

Our work has only begun to address the demand for our loans and need for our advisory services. It will take further capital investments in our lending model to continue this necessary work. Without this additional support, our initiative and others like it will only scratch the surface of providing access to capital by qualified local small businesses.

Terry Brandt is executive director of Albina Opportunities Corporation.

November 12 to 18 is Global Entrepreneurship Week, and Ecotrust and Portland, OR are getting a running start on the festivities, with a focus on social entrepreneurship. We’ll be hosting events at Ecotrust, talking about others around town and curating some extra discussion around social enterprise. How are you @unleashingideas during #GEW? See you on Twitter.

 

 

On November 6, Californians will vote on whether to require foods containing Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) to be labeled. People around the country are paying close attention to the measure; many believe it will result in GMO labeling across the country. (Historically, when California has enacted product label requirements, companies have changed their labels tout de suite.)

Whether or not genetically engineered seeds should be sold to farmers is not a question posed by Proposition 37; nor is whether foods grown from those seeds—most often as ingredients in processed foods—should be sold to eaters. Rather, Prop. 37 addresses whether citizens should have the right to make individual choices about the contents of what they buy and eat. Whatever the final outcome, Prop. 37 is raising awareness about very complicated issues in the business of food, including all of the inputs that farmers purchase to grow our food supply.

On Saturday, Oct. 20, come to the Portland Farmers Market for a workshop on seed saving and a seed exchange. Photo by Carole Topalian

Tomorrow, October 20, the Northwest Food Sovereignty Coalition is hosting a day of celebration called the Seed Freedom Summit, at the Portland Farmers Market.  Although nothing akin to Prop. 37 is currently on Oregon ballots, the Northwest Food Sovereignty Coalition has begun working at the grassroots level in Portland to address issues around who owns seeds; how seeds are propagated, distributed, and saved; and the significance of genetic diversity within our food supply—all issues tightly nested in the national and international conversations around GMOs.

The Summit will begin with music and poetry, followed by a seed saving workshop, then a panel discussion with activists working on the local and global stages, and finally a potluck and seed exchange. All events are free, and everyone is welcome to join in at any point.

One of the coalition’s leaders is Karen Swift. Raised on a farm in California where her family grew subtropical fruits, including passion fruit, feijoa, horned melon, and diverse vegetables, Swift became active in California as a founder of the Biosafety Alliance, a coalition working to bring many people to the table to talk about GMOs. The Alliance’s work dovetailed into the campaign launched by Pamm Larry, a grandmother from Chico, that eventually fed into Prop. 37.

Swift has since moved to Portland to study law at Lewis & Clark, and has taken her passion for food activism with her. In the spring, Swift and the Biosafety Alliance hosted Indian seed freedom advocate Dr. Vandana Shiva in a conversation at Ecotrust.

On International Food Day, October 16, Edible Portland sat down with Swift to learn more about the seed freedom movement and her vision for a new economy.

Q.When you began the Biosafety Alliance in California, your focus was not on legislation, but on coalition building and grassroots activism. You’re taking that same approach here. Why not focus on legislation?

A.We support Prop. 37; we simultaneously need to find other means to grow movements addressing GMOs. I think we really need to focus on localization, supporting local seed growers, bringing back cultural traditions around food, bringing back diversity and alternative varieties.

We’re going to have a seed saving workshop on Saturday. A lot of that knowledge [around how to save seed] has been eroded globally. In the U.S., the erosion of [seed-saving] knowledge has also brought about the erosion of varieties. We need a network of seed savers and more reclamation of varieties.

I also see a need for more lawyers to work around transactional legal matters – financing farmer cooperatives and entities that support the local economy. It’s very difficult for small farmers to access capital.

Q.How would Prop. 37 passing change the conversation around GMOs?

A.I think it will be interesting to see if there is a big consumer push back. Biotech industry leaders have said labeling GMOs is akin to stopping GMOs because they know people don’t want to buy it. So maybe there will be.

I think patents on seeds are a huge issue. The idea that you can patent seeds is strange. I think debunking the underlying justifications is really important. Until 1924 the USDA was handing out seeds you could plant. And then in 1924 the privatization of the seed supply began as another way to make money… The Plant Variety Protection Act was passed in 1970 specifically not to allow for patents on seeds. They were going to allow for a protection on seeds – you have 20 years to market your specifically bred variety and get some kind of market favoritism. In 1985, the Patent and Trademark Office suddenly decided that seeds were patentable. Then in 2002, the Supreme Court legitimized that decision. There is a lot to be challenged. We haven’t legitimized this system that promotes monoculture rather than diversification, but we will every time we remain silent.

Q.The seed freedom movement is global in scale, inspired by people like Dr. Vandana Shiva. How do you see local efforts impacting what’s happening around the world?

A.It’s a challenging question: How do we really stand in solidarity with people internationally? I think awareness-raising and getting people to learn about what’s going on globally [is significant]. At the local level, we can create new economic models that don’t depend on the corporate system, which needs people to sustain it. We can support an alternative that actually helps make obsolete the system that we have exported.

When I first moved [to Portland], my frustration was that a lot of people are living an alternative lifestyle, but they seem very apolitical. They are stepping outside, growing their own food – and that is a political act. But they are not getting involved in the political processes. I think people need to stand in both worlds. There’s amazing potential for change in small pockets – that’s where change comes from.

 

FoodHub, Ecotrust’s online food marketplace, and Boston-based social venture OR FoodEx  announced today their intention to partner on a new joint venture designed to overcome the single biggest barrier to building robust regional food economies: distribution.

FoodHub’s a “meet market” for producers and wholesale buyers, and it now has 4,000 members across the West.

The new venture will integrate the technology, teams, and expertise of the two entities to create an online matchmaking and on-the-ground logistics solution that helps wholesale food buyers overcome a host of obstacles to sourcing food from local producers.

Beginning in 2013, the combined platform will build connections and online transactions between wholesale buyers — including universities, corporate cafeterias, hospitals, schools, and retailers — and local producers, and it will leverage FoodEx’s existing trucking and logistics infrastructure to deliver products from multiple producers on a consolidated delivery and invoicing system.

The integrated FoodHub + FoodEx system will retain the source identity throughout the value chain, while online profiles will provide stories and pictures from the producers for chefs and grocers to share with eaters.

Once the new group refines the combined model in New England, the joint venture will seek to replicate it in FoodHub’s home region on the West Coast.

Most importantly, the innovative model will put more of the value created in the wholesale food supply chain into the pockets of farmers, fishermen, and ranchers. This will allow them to stay on their land and in their boats, and make food production more attractive to the next generation, all of which will be imperative in the years to come as demand for local food continues to grow.

Founder and CEO of OR FoodEx, JD Kemp, and Amanda Oborne, director of FoodHub, announced the partnership while presenting on a panel at the SXSW Eco conference in Austin, TX today.  Along with Ecotrust’s executive vice president and panel moderator Astrid Scholz, Oborne and Kemp used an infographic recently released by FoodHub called the Local Food Technology Landscape as a platform for both envisioning an alternative food system and calling attention to the newly formed partnership.

Amanda Oborne, director of FoodHub.

The vision of the yet-to-be-named joint venture is to create an alternative, regionally-based and transparent food value chain across the nation. As Spencer Beebe, founder of Ecotrust, explained, “Ecotrust and FoodEx are in perfect alignment on the goal of this new company – we’re going to change the food system.”

FoodEx CEO Kemp said, “To change the system, we have to create an economically viable, workable alternative. Independent, family-scale farmers, ranchers, fishermen, dairies, and specialty producers are making an enormous amount of good, fresh, healthy food in this country. There are also millions of people who care about where their food comes from and how it was produced. The system doesn’t work for any of them right now.”

Background

Kemp launched FoodEx in 2009 out of warehouses in Boston and Athol, MA, distributing products for independent producers primarily to specialty retailers and grocery co-ops. A systems-optimization engineer by trade, Kemp had a vision for what systemic change in the food supply chain could look like, and he knew it required a much bigger scale. In the fall of 2011, FoodEx launched a pilot distribution project to aggregate supply from local farmers and deliver the products to the foodservice contractor at two area universities.

In early 2012, FoodHub’s Oborne was surveying innovations in the local food and technology sector and called Kemp to learn about his business. The two hit it off immediately. “I remember proposing the partnership that we’re now executing the very first time I spoke to JD. We shared the same mission, but were coming at it from opposite ends,” she explained. “With FoodHub we had built a very user-friendly platform for helping local food buyers and sellers find each other and connect, but we couldn’t solve their distribution challenges. FoodEx had pioneered a disruptive model for regional-scale fulfillment, but their platform was missing the producers’ stories and all the relationship-building tools we had developed. It felt like peanut butter and jelly.”

Merging technologies and teams is a lot harder than making a sandwich, however. FoodHub is based in Portland and FoodEx in Boston, so the new venture will take some time to build. Oborne emphasized that FoodHub is committed to maintaining and enhancing its existing networks. “There are more than 4,000 food producers, wholesale buyers, and industry suppliers who are actively using FoodHub to connect, and we are 100% committed to facilitating those connections,” she said. “FoodHub members will also be the first to know about and have access to the new integrated solution when it’s launched here, so now is a great time to join.”

Kemp added, “We have the wheels on the ground in Boston. With this partnership and our combined platforms, our producers will have one more tool in their kit to help market their products to an ever-increasing array of buyers hungry for local food. We couldn’t have asked for a better solution to both enhance and streamline our offerings.”

Ecotrust’s Scholz told audiences at SXSW Eco that “this is just the kind of unusual alliance and 21st-century solution we are constantly seeking at Ecotrust. It seems a natural evolution of the work we’ve been doing to build robust regional food systems for the past 20 years.  We couldn’t be more excited about the potential for this partnership to reshape the food system for greater good.”

 

Exequiel Ezcurra is that rare breed of scientist and conservationist who is also a lyrical storyteller. What’s more, the canvas for all his work is the severe, awe-inspiring Sonoran Desert, which straddles the U.S.-Mexico border, from southwestern Arizona through eastern California and down into Mexico on both sides of the Gulf of California. Born in Argentina, educated in England, Ezcurra has focused on the peculiar oases of the Sonoran Desert, as he led ecology laboratories at the Mexican Museum of Natural History and the National Autonomous University of Mexico and served the government natural resources division. These oases are formed by rocky reefs, sea mounts, mangrove swamps, remote islands, mountain pine forests and upwelling zones that bring life to a desolate land- and seascape. (Mother Jones’ Julia Whitty wrote recently about one of these spots, Rasa Island, a rookery for terns and gulls that Ezcurra’s longtime colleague Enriqueta Velarde has made her life’s work.)

Exequiel Ezcurra, left, with the author.

Ezcurra has continued to be outspoken and active in protecting these oases as he has moved north of the border, to the San Diego Museum of Natural History, serving as its provost for five years, and now to the University of California’s MEXUS research program, where he overseas young Mexican academics doing cross-border research.  It was through the San Diego Museum of Natural History that he scripted and narrated a virtual IMAX tour of his beloved Baja California in the celebrated film Ocean Oases. Suffice it to say, Ezcurra has found his home region, the place where he belongs.

Last year, Ezcurra suggested that Spencer and Sam Beebe visit Francisco Mayoral and learn how the breeding gray whales of Baja’s Laguna San Ignacio had reconnected with fishermen and paved the way for boosting the local economy with successful local whale watching. Yesterday, we had the good fortune of hosting Ezcurra here at Ecotrust for a day of conversation. And in the midst of an hour-long video interview, Ezcurra offered a strong — and characteristically poetic — endorsement of organizing societal change in the 21st century around home regions, those places we belong to and care deeply about.

Exequiel Ezcurra on a sense of place.

Connect with us: